Today in Superconducting Qubits

Coherent errors from codes to couplers

5 papers Scanned 86 new, 29 cross-list, 53 revised submissions

Hardware and quantum information science share a through-line: coherent control imperfections, not just random Pauli noise. A proven positive threshold for coherent -rotation noise—unwanted unitary phase rotations—on quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, including the surface code, sits beside a Magnus-expansion pulse correction that suppresses non-adiabatic coupler leakage in fast transmon iSWAP gates (excitation-swapping two-qubit gates) with a single baseband flux control. Off the chip, an impedance-matched cavity atomic-frequency-comb (AFC) memory in reaches ~90% optical storage efficiency, while LIGO shows kilogram-scale back-action evasion and diamond offers a quasi-1D dipolar ensemble of substitutional-nitrogen P1 centers.

New Superconducting Qubits

Analytic leakage suppression with a single control field: fast two-qubit gates with tunable couplers

Lukas Heunisch , Michael J. Hartmann , Aashish A. Clerk

Physics Department, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany; Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering and Chicago Quantum Institute, The University of Chicago

Standard DRAG and transitionless-driving leakage fixes need a second control quadrature that baseband flux tuning does not provide—yet a Magnus-expansion correction on that single flux channel alone cuts simulated coupler-ramp leakage in a fast iSWAP by up to .

Read the notes Hide the notes

TL;DR A Magnus-expansion pulse correction (a series that builds the time-evolution operator order by order) suppresses non-adiabatic coupler leakage using only a single real baseband flux control—no second quadrature as in DRAG (derivative removal by adiabatic gate, which cancels leakage with an orthogonal drive) or transitionless driving (a shortcuts-to-adiabaticity method that cancels non-adiabatic couplings with an extra control). In simulated fast coupler-mediated iSWAP gates (excitation-swapping two-qubit gates) between transmons, the correction cuts ramp-induced leakage by up to three orders of magnitude for realistic device parameters.

  • Main result: Analytic shaping of a single baseband flux pulse suppresses non-adiabatic leakage when a tunable coupler is ramped for a fast two-qubit gate, without a second orthogonal control channel.
  • Hardware target: The method is demonstrated in simulation for coupler-mediated gates between transmons under baseband flux control—the architecture constraint that normally excludes standard DRAG and transitionless-driving corrections.
  • Gate impact: For realistic parameters, leakage in a fast iSWAP is reduced by up to three orders of magnitude relative to uncorrected ramps.
  • Mechanism: The Magnus-derived correction does more than notch spectral weight at leakage transitions; it cancels the leading non-adiabatic coupling generated by the coupler ramp in the adiabatic frame.
  • Scope: The same single-channel shaping extends across single- and two-excitation leakage pathways and can refine other shaped pulses (e.g., Slepian envelopes) used in cQED coupler control.
New Quantum Information Science

Proof of a positive coherent-error threshold for topological quantum codes

Shiro Tamiya , Masato Koashi

Photon Science Center and Department of Applied Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo

Stochastic thresholds do not cover coherent rotations from imperfect control—yet this proof shows quantum LDPC codes with few logical qubits still have a positive coherent-error threshold, with maximum-likelihood Pauli recovery killing entanglement infidelity exponentially in the code distance .

Read the notes Hide the notes

TL;DR A positive error-correction threshold exists for coherent -rotation noise—unwanted unitary phase rotations from imperfect control, not random Pauli flips—on quantum LDPC codes (including the surface code) with a bounded number of logical qubits. Maximum-likelihood Pauli recovery then drives the entanglement infidelity down exponentially in the code distance , up to a prefactor linear in the number of physical qubits, whenever every qubit’s rotation angle stays below a size-independent constant.

  • Main result: For CSS quantum LDPC codes with a bounded number of logical qubits, coherent per-qubit rotations admit a positive threshold under maximum-likelihood Pauli recovery.
  • Infidelity scaling: Below that angle bound, the entanglement infidelity is suppressed exponentially in , with only a prefactor linear in the number of physical qubits.
  • Scope: The theorem covers the surface code and other topological codes in that family; prior surface-code evidence for coherent-error thresholds was numerical, not a proof.
  • Method: Fourier analysis keeps the interference among coherent-error amplitudes, then abstract polymer models and their cluster expansion control the residual logical failure.
  • Significance: The argument gives a statistical-mechanical footing for quantum error correction beyond stochastic Pauli noise.
New Quantum Information Science

90%-Efficient Optical Storage in a Rare-Earth Crystal with a Low-Loss Impedance-Matched Cavity

Weiye Sun , Fudong Wang , Mucheng Guo , Xiantong An , Zhenqi Xu , Zhehao Xu , Xingmin He , Matthew J.Sellars , Shuping Liu , and Manjin Zhong

Southern University of Science and Technology; International Quantum Academy / Shenzhen Branch, Hefei National Laboratory; Australian National University

After cutting round-trip cavity loss to , a cavity atomic-frequency-comb (AFC) memory—spectral teeth that rephase stored light—in hits storage efficiency, and the next barrier is comb preparation, not mirrors.

Read the notes Hide the notes

TL;DR An impedance-matched cavity atomic-frequency-comb (AFC) memory—periodic spectral teeth that rephase and recall a stored optical pulse—in stores coherent pulses at efficiency. Brewster-angle crystal mounting and a fully cryogenic Fabry–Pérot cavity cut round-trip intracavity loss to , so modeling finds remaining headroom is set by AFC preparation and its dispersive response rather than by residual cavity loss.

  • Main result: Coherent optical pulses are stored and recalled at efficiency in an impedance-matched cavity AFC memory in .
  • Loss engineering: Brewster-angle crystal geometry plus a fully cryogenic Fabry–Pérot cavity reduce round-trip intracavity parasitic loss to .
  • Why impedance matching matters: Matching input-mirror leakage to the absorber-enhanced cavity loss lets weak rare-earth absorption capture the incident field without free-space reabsorption limits.
  • Bottleneck shift: Quantitative modeling shows further gains toward unity efficiency are limited mainly by imperfect AFC preparation and the comb’s associated dispersive response, not by leftover cavity loss.
  • QIS stake: High-efficiency rare-earth AFC memories are a photonic–matter interface for quantum networking once optical depth no longer caps recall fidelity.
New Other

Observing and evading quantum back-action on a kilogram-scale oscillator

Begüm Kabagöz , Eric Oelker , Dhruva Ganapathy , Nergis Mavalvala , Vivishek Sudhir , Vladimir Bossilkov , Joseph Betzweiser , Valery V. Frolov , Anamaria Effler , Adam Mullavey , Lisa Barsotti , Evan D. Hall , Peter Fritschel , R. Abbott , I. Abouelfettouh , R. X. Adhikari , A. Ananyeva , S. Appert , S. K. Apple , K. Arai , N. Aritomi , S. M. Aston , M. Ball , S. W. Ballmer , D. Barker , B. K. Berger , D. Bhattacharjee , G. Billingsley , S. Biscans , C. D. Blair , N. Bode , E. Bonilla , A. Branch , A. F. Brooks , D. D. Brown , J. Bryant , C. Cahillane , A. Calafat , S. R. Callos , H. Cao , E. Capote , F. Clara , J. Collins , C. M. Compton , G. Connolly , R. Cottingham , D. C. Coyne , R. Crouch , J. Csizmazia , A. Cumming , L. P. Dartez , D. Davis , N. Demos , E. Dohmen , K. L. Dooley , J. C. Driggers , S. E. Dwyer , A. Ejlli , T. Etzel , M. Evans , J. Feicht , R. Frey , W. Frischhertz , M. Fuentes-Garcia , P. Fulda , M. Fyffe , B. Gateley , T. Gayer , J. A. Giaime , K. D. Giardina , J. Glanzer , E. Goetz , R. Goetz , A. W. Goodwin-Jones , S. Gras , C. Gray , D. Griffith , H. Grote , T. Guidry , J. Gurs , J. Hanks , J. Hanson , M. C. Heintze , A. F. Helmling-Cornell , N. A. Holland , D. Hoyland , H. Y. Huang , Y. Inoue , A. L. James , A. Jamies , R. Jaume , A. Jennings , W. Jia , D. H. Jones , S. Karat , S. Karki , M. Kasprzack , K. Kawabe , N. Kijbunchoo , P. J. King , J. S. Kissel , K. Komori , A. Kontos , R. Kumar , K. Kuns , M. Landry , B. Lantz , M. Laxen , K. Lee , M. Lesovsky , F. Llamas Villarreal , M. Lormand , H. A. Loughlin , R. Macas , M. MacInnis , C. N. Makarem , B. Mannix , G. L. Mansell , R. M. Martin , K. Mason , F. Matichard , N. Maxwell , G. McCarrol , R. McCarthy , D. E. McClelland , S. McCormick , T. McRae , F. Mera , E. L. Merilh , J. R. Mérou , F. Meylahn , R. Mittleman , D. Moraru , G. Moreno , M. Nakano , T. J. N. Nelson , A. Neunzert , J. Notte , J. Oberling , T. O'Hanlon , R. Oram , C. Osthelder , D. J. Ottaway , H. Overmier , W. Parker , O. Patane , A. Pele , H. Pham , M. Pirello , J. Pullin , V. Quetschke , K. E. Ramirez , K. Ransom , J. Reyes , J. W. Richardson , M. Robinson , J. G. Rollins , C. L. Romel , J. H. Romie , M. P. Ross , B. I. Rotimi , K. Ryan , T. Sadecki , A. Sanchez , E. J. Sanchez , L. E. Sanchez , R. L. Savage , D. Schaetzl , M. G. Schiworski , R. Schnabel , R. M. S. Schofield , E. Schwartz , D. Sellers , T. Shaffer , R. W. Short , D. Sigg , B. J. J. Slagmolen , C. Soike , S. Soni , V. Srivastava , L. Sun , D. B. Tanner , M. Thomas , P. Thomas , K. A. Thorne , M. R. Todd , C. I. Torrie , G. Traylor , A. S. Ubhi , G. Vajente , J. Vanosky , A. Vecchio , P. J. Veitch , A. M. Vibhute , E. R. G. von Reis , J. Warner , B. Weaver , R. Weiss , C. Whittle , B. Willke , C. C. Wipf , J. L. Wright , V. A. Xu , H. Yamamoto , L. Zhang , M. E. Zucker (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors) et al. (106 additional authors not shown) You must enable JavaScript to view entire author list.

LIGO Laboratory and Department of Physics, MIT; Department of Physics, UC Berkeley; LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors et al.

On LIGO’s 40-kg mirrors, engineering the dark-port quantum state cuts observed motion near a radiation-pressure-trapped sub-Hz resonance by ~47%—back-action evasion you can resolve into imprecision, force noise, and their correlation.

Read the notes Hide the notes

TL;DR LIGO traps the differential motion of its 40-kg mirrors into a sub-Hz-linewidth optomechanical mode—a radiation-pressure-dominated mechanical resonance—and engineers the quantum state entering the dark port (the normally unused interferometer output) so readout imprecision and measurement back-action (radiation-pressure force noise) partially cancel. Observed motion near resonance drops by ~47%, demonstrating back-action evasion and quantum reservoir engineering (shaping the effective bath via the input optical state) at kilogram scale.

  • Main result: Correlations between imprecision and back-action, set by the engineered dark-port state, suppress observed mirror motion near the trapped resonance by ~47%.
  • Platform: Differential motion of LIGO’s 40-kg test masses is optically trapped into a sub-Hz-linewidth optomechanical mode in a band where radiation-pressure back-action dominates the dynamics.
  • Mechanism: Continuous displacement sensing normally trades readout imprecision against measurement back-action under the Heisenberg limit; engineered imprecision–back-action correlations partially cancel those contributions in the observed spectrum.
  • Analysis: A noise decomposition into imprecision, back-action, and correlation terms isolates the origin of the suppression.
  • Significance: The experiment shows quantum back-action evasion and quantum reservoir engineering in a macroscopic optomechanical system relevant to gravitational-wave detectors.
New Other

Engineering and Probing a One-Dimensional Dipolar Spin Ensemble in Diamond

Lingjie Chen , Shreyas Parthasarathy , Simon A. Meynell , Lillian B. Hughes Wyatt , Eveline Postelnicu , Haopu Yang , Zilin Wang , Weijie Wu , Winston V. Peloso , Casey K. Kim , Chris R. Laumann , Kunal Mukherjee , Norman Y. Yao , Ania C. Bleszynski Jayich

University of California, Santa Barbara; California Institute of Technology; Stanford University; Harvard University; Boston University; Max-Planck-Institut für Physik Komplexer Systeme

CVD step bunches can laterally and vertically confine a disordered P1–NV chain—turning optically dark substitutional-nitrogen P1 spins into a quasi-1D dipolar bath whose infinite-temperature transport is read out by nearby NV sensors via correlation spectroscopy.

Read the notes Hide the notes

TL;DR Preferential nitrogen incorporation along CVD step bunches yields a positionally disordered, quasi-1D chain of optically dark substitutional-nitrogen P1 centers probed by nearby NV centers, establishing a materials route to low-dimensional dipolar spin ensembles and enabling correlation-spectroscopy studies of infinite-temperature dipolar spin transport.

  • Main result: Preferential N incorporation along chemical-vapor-deposition step bunches laterally and vertically confines a disordered P1–NV spin chain in diamond and establishes its quasi-1D character.
  • Probe platform: Optically dark, unpolarized P1 centers (substitutional nitrogen) form the interacting bath; optically addressable NV centers act as local sensors of that bath.
  • Transport probe: Correlation spectroscopy—a two-time NV measurement of local spin autocorrelations—is used to investigate infinite-temperature dipolar spin transport in the dark P1 ensemble.
  • Why it matters: The work gives a materials-based path to engineer low-dimensional solid-state spin systems beyond bulk magnetic insulators, with single-defect readout of many-body dipolar dynamics.